But_home
But_blogshome
But_forum
Icon_rss_infobarSubscribe to receive updates
on new articles and posts from this blog.
 

Video Day in Review from AHA: Monday, November 16


From the American Heart Association 2009 Scientific Sessions in Orlando, FL, join Dr Melissa Walton-Shirley for a review of:

  • ARBITER 6-HALTS.
  • Primary PCI in Massachusetts.
  • Acute heart attack patients requiring high ionizing radiation dose.
  • Oil from biotech soybeans increases key omega-3 fatty acid in humans.
  • Playing active video games can equate to moderate intensity exercise.
  • Impact of transfusion triggers on postoperative MI or death.
  • Trial to reduce cardiovascular events with darbepoetin alfa.

 

See:

ARBITER 6-HALTS: HDL raising with niacin superior to ezetimibe

Massachusetts data show similar STEMI PCI outcomes in hospitals with or without surgery

Comments

Having read your several parapgraph statement on the outcome of the CMS efforts to reduce medicare payments to private practice cardiology outside of the so-called "integrated system" of care and after seeing the actual numbers on simple procedures such as stress echo in the office setting vs. hospital setting its dumbfounding that CMS would support such a differing amount of reimbursement. My organization in Memphis includes 15 Cardiologists all boarded and most of whom eligible for or are boarded in several subspecialties in Cardiology. We provide care to over 35,000 patients a year and have rural clinics in Ark, Tn, and Ms. outside of our two main offices. We employ close to 100 individuals some for over 25 years. We obviously provide nuclear, echo and all of the appropriate ancillaries any full service small or large cardiololgy practice would provide and perform state of the art interventional coronary, carotid, abdominal aortice and peripheral procedures along with EP studies no other group in our community can provide. In other words, Cardiologists in our community refer some of their patients to us for management. We also have an out-patient HF clinic and an active research program. We see many "self-pay" patients. Our practice will be devastated by this change in reimbursement. We will not be able to support our present level of staffing, manage things such as  PQRI, handle our patient call backs, and in general provide the level of support to our patients, and in particular medicare patients, they expect and are accustomed to receiving. Our group is NCQA certified and I have pesonally passed this certification on a second go round. Most likely this type of accountalbility will be much more difficult to maintain without appropriate staffing. We have a Cardiology specific EMR that requires a significant amount of infrastructure to keep up and running and the expense involved is enormous. The concept that we should not make a good living for what we do is wrong. We all work over 50 hours a week. Continue to take call on top of this work schedule and are responsible for STEMI patients as you are. All in all, it doesn't seem to rosy for us in the near future for the level of expertise, responsibility and work requirements we all have. Appreciate your efforts.
Posted by davidkraus, Nov 27, 2009 at 08:08 PM, EDT

David,

I can only hope that by the time these cuts are to go into effect, that someone in the political world has come to their senses.  As I stated, the first place to cut back is NOT in the subspecialty that treats our most expensive DRG in this nation.  I'd rather see the catalyst of personal responsbility injected into health care spending with smoke free legislation.  Pay offs are nearly instantaneous and sustained over the long term.  I'd rather do that than cut any subspecialists salary.

thanks so much for posting and please tell your colleagues that I appreciate the excellent hard work they are doing.  Sounds like you guys are on the same battle fields and in the same trenches that my partners and I find ourselves in all the time. 

 Keep up the great work!

Melissa


Posted by Melissa, Nov 30, 2009 at 08:05 PM, EDT

Add your own comments



 


This blog on theheart.org is a sounding board for healthcare providers, clinicians, and researchers, and is not intended to supply answers or advice to patients. We reserve the right to remove posts containing inappropriate language, promotional content, personal agendas or hostile intent, and posts from patients asking for medical advice.

In the interest of promoting a balanced exchange, please disclose any relevant relationships or conflicts of interest when posting your comment.

The views and opinions expressed herein are those of the blogger and do not necessarily reflect those of theheart.org.